Court limits ‘business method’ patents

October 31st, 2008

A federal appeals court on Thursday ruled against a man trying to patent a business idea, a decision with far-ranging implications for the financial services and high-tech industries, which have major players …

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

A Palm Springs, San Diego & Orange County Law Firm Looks at the Worldwide Patenting System and It’s Harmful Effect on Medical & Biotechnology Research

October 30th, 2008

Palm Desert, San Diego and Orange County California Intellectual Property Attorney Explains the Worldwide Intellectual Property System
By: R. Sebastian Gibson | 20/10/2008 | Intellectual Property
Huntington Beach, Orange County, San Diego and Palm Springs Intellectual Property Lawyer Sebastian Gibson examines the intellectual property system in place worldwide. As the senior partner in a law firm which assists clients with their patents, trademarks and copyrights, Sebastian Gibson has nearly thirty years of experience in representing clients in Southern California from Anaheim, Irvine, Newport Beach, and Carlsbad to Ontario and Santa Barbara.

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

You Paid What For That Patent? How Patent Counsel Hiring is Like the VP Wardrobe Buying Process

October 29th, 2008

Those responsible for dressing Gov. Palin apparently believed that the large expenditures at Saks and Neiman Marcus automatically translated into value for the Republican ticket by allowing her to be viewed as more “Vice Presidential” than she would otherwise been considered. Notwithstanding the high cost of her new wardrobe, as reported in the New York Times, her overall “look” remains the same as when she campaigned for and served as Governor of Alaska: business-appropriate jackets, feminine skirts and high heels. The response to this wardrobe makeover by a major fashion commentator: “Honey, I could have dressed you for a lot less than that.” From this comment, as well as the continuing backlash about the cost, it appears that the expense of Gov. Palin’s wardrobe does not directly correlate with the value provided to the McCain-Palin presidential ticket.

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

NetApp ready to rumble in Sun IP case

October 28th, 2008

Hey, who took my WAFL? Posted in Enterprise , 27th October 2008 11:04A GMT NetApp co-founder Dave Hitz has challenged Sun to come to court now and get the ZFS-WAFL IP case sorted as fast as possible.

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

A Palm Springs, San Diego & Orange County Law Firm Looks at the Worldwide Patenting System and It’s Harmful Effect on Medical & Biotechnology Research

October 27th, 2008

Palm Desert, San Diego and Orange County California Intellectual Property Attorney Explains the Worldwide Intellectual Property System
By: R. Sebastian Gibson | 20/10/2008 | Intellectual Property
Huntington Beach, Orange County, San Diego and Palm Springs Intellectual Property Lawyer Sebastian Gibson examines the intellectual property system in place worldwide. As the senior partner in a law firm which assists clients with their patents, trademarks and copyrights, Sebastian Gibson has nearly thirty years of experience in representing clients in Southern California from Anaheim, Irvine, Newport Beach, and Carlsbad to Ontario and Santa Barbara.

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

The Broken Worldwide Patenting System and It’s Effect on Medical and Biotechnology Research

October 26th, 2008

Whether you are employed as a scientist or as a company do research anywhere in California, including cities where biotechnology and other medical science is being studied or where research takes place, especially the areas around cities such as San Diego, Irvine, Orange County, Los Angeles, La Jolla, Riverside, Fullerton, San Francisco, Santa Barbara and other cities where there are universities or large research projects taking place in the U.S. and throughout the world, you know that patent laws and patent licensing is acting as a barrier to medical and biotechnology research and preventing advances in science.

It doesn’t take a California patent attorney or CA patent lawyer to say how the world’s patent system is today acting as a barrier to medical and biotechnology research that could solve many of today’s worst diseases and preventing breakthrough treatments, medicines and even new seeds for better crops.

A new report has come out after a seven year study and confirmed what most patent licensing lawyers, medical researchers and biotechnologists have known for years. The patent system in force worldwide is broken and preventing breakthroughs in science.

Without a means for sharing information, blocking patents are causing delays in developing advances in cancer medicine treatments and in the development of new food crops.

The report performed by a Canada based partnership cited as examples of medical advances being delayed as those of HIV/Aids drugs and cancer screening tests.

Of concern to scientists is an increasingly bare medicine chest of new life-saving medicines that are critical not just to the developing world but to the industrialized nations as well to address disease. New food crops are also lagging behind that could help address hunger.

And while stem cell researchers apparently patent the most, they collaborate least according to the report.

What happens is that “blocking patents” act as barriers to research and advances in biotechnology that could advance cancer treatment, new medicines and new crops.

When biotech firms race to file a “fortress” of patents around newly discovered genes, research by their competitors is effectively blocked.

Another example given by scientists is work on genes that cause breast cancer in European countries that has been held up by patents held on specific genes by one biotech company in the U.S. With patients in European countries unable to meet the cost of certain cancer screening tests, they have been effectively denied access to such tests.

A recommendation of the report is that companies should be allowed to form “patent pools” where they could cross-license their patented technologies without losing royalties from their patents. It is also recommended that governments develop other public and private partnerships to conduct joint research.

The criticism of the current patenting system is that it acts more as a barrier than as an incentive to research and the development of medical or other biotechnological breakthroughs.

When a patent office grants dangerously broad patents, entirely new areas of research, such as in the field of nanotechnology, can be cut off.

So long as intellectual property and patent laws act as a barrier from others utilizing and expanding upon one scientist’s research, the laws will prevent scientists from making advances that can benefit mankind. This lack of sharing is preventing biotechnology from becoming the field that it once promised.

Sebastian Gibson graduated cum laude at UCLA in 1972 and received two law degrees in the U.S. and the U.K., graduating with an LL.B. magna cum laude from University College, Cardiff in Wales and a J.D. from the University of San Diego School of Law in Southern California.

The Sebastian Gibson Law Firm serves all of San Diego, Orange County, Palm Springs and Palm Desert, the Coastal Cities from La Jolla and Del Mar to Laguna Beach, Newport Beach, Irvine, Santa Ana and Irvine and up to Ventura, Santa Barbara and San Luis Obispo. We also serve the Inland Empire cities of Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, Temecula, Riverside and San Bernardino and all the cities in the Coachella Valley

If you have an intellectual property, patent, trademark, or copyright matter anywhere in Southern California, we invite you to visit our website by clicking on one of these two links. We have the knowledge and resources to represent you as your San Diego Patent Attorney and La Jolla Patent Lawyer in Ontario, Rancho Cucamonga, San Diego, Orange County, Palm Springs, Palm Desert, Thermal, Long Beach, Santa Ana, Anaheim, Riverside, Chula Vista, Irvine, San Bernardino, Huntington Beach, Fontana, Moreno Valley, Oceanside, Garden Grove, Palmdale, Corona, Escondido, Orange, Fullerton, Costa Mesa, Victorville, Carlsbad, Temecula, Murrieta, Mission Viejo, El Cajon, Vista, Westminster, Santa Monica, Santa Barbara, Hesperia, Newport Beach, Buena Park, Indio, and Coachella.

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

EU software patent issue goes to appeals body

October 25th, 2008

Alison Brimelow, president of the European Patent Office, has referred the deeply contentious question about how to assess the patentability of software-related inventions to her office’s top appeals body, the …

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

A Palm Springs, San Diego & Orange County Law Firm Looks at the Worldwide Patenting System and It’s Harmful Effect on Medical & Biotechnology Research

October 24th, 2008

Palm Desert, San Diego and Orange County California Intellectual Property Attorney Explains the Worldwide Intellectual Property System
By: R. Sebastian Gibson | 20/10/2008 | Intellectual Property
Huntington Beach, Orange County, San Diego and Palm Springs Intellectual Property Lawyer Sebastian Gibson examines the intellectual property system in place worldwide. As the senior partner in a law firm which assists clients with their patents, trademarks and copyrights, Sebastian Gibson has nearly thirty years of experience in representing clients in Southern California from Anaheim, Irvine, Newport Beach, and Carlsbad to Ontario and Santa Barbara.

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

Understanding Patent Rights

October 23rd, 2008

When an inventor comes up with new and innovative product, most of the time inventor feels that he can get patent right on his product to have monopoly and to make, use and sell his patented product.

Here is the important point to note by all new inventors is that patent does not provide positive right to make, use or sell his patented products, but rather it provides negative right to exclude others from making, using or selling the invention. Do you understand the above statement? If your answer is no, then please read further.

Here you will get a clear picture by reading the following simple example “stool and chair invention concept”, which is familiar to all patent practitioners.

A portable seating appliance art ’stool’ having platform with three legs was invented by Abraham. And he applied for a patent and obtained patent grant for his invention.

Another inventor Bartholomew had come with invention “chair”, in which he added a fourth leg, back support and arm support to have more comfortable. As the “chair’ has improvement over the ’stool’, the patent office granted a patent to Bartholomew for his invention.

Now there is interesting question, who owns what rights?

Abraham invented basic portable appliance art ’stool’, and he can exclude others from making, using, or selling his stool invention and also he can make, use and sell his invention ’stool’ with out any fear of infringing others patent right. Hence, he has both negative right and positive right on his invention.

Where as, Bartholomew can only exclude [negative right] others from making, using or selling devices which has four leg, back support and arm support, and his patent does not give him any right to make these devices. Indeed, since chair also has a platform and three legs [which is equivalent to stool], if chairs are made without obtaining a license from Abraham, then it will be infringing Abraham’s stool patent.

Thus, it will be clear that a person having a patent does not give that person the right to practice his invention. The basic patent only has both positive and negative right, where as all improvement patent enables their owner to exclude others from practicing their patented products.

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

Trademark Law Meets Criminal Law

October 22nd, 2008

This seems to me a questionable tactic. The feds are going after the Mongols, a criminal enterprise on wheels, and they want to seize control of their trademarks so that they can harass people wearing Mongols …

Read more

Posted in Guide of Patent Protection | No Comments »

« Previous Entries